Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646492›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Utilizing machine learning models for predicting outcomes in acute pancreatitis: development and validation in three retrospective cohorts.

Kaier Gu, Yang Liu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kaier GuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Shaoxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China. liuyangmd@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute pancreatitis (AP) is associated with a high readmission rate; however, there is a paucity of models capable of predicting post-discharge outcomes. Furthermore, existing in-hospital prediction models exhibit notable limitations. This study leverages machine learning (ML) technology to develop prognosis prediction models for AP patients, encompassing in-hospital mortality, readmission rates, and post-discharge mortality.

methodsA retrospective analysis was carried out on the clinical and laboratory data of AP patients from three databases (MIMIC database, eICU database, and Wenzhou Hospital in China), and they were divided into a training set and two validation sets. In the training set, key variables were screened using univariate logistic regression and the LASSO method. Six ML algorithms were employed to construct predictive models. The performance of these models was appraised using receiver operating characteristic curves, decision curve analysis, Shapley additive explanations plots, and other relevant metrics. A comparison was made between the predictive capabilities of the ML models and clinical scores. Subsequently, the performance of the machine learning models was subjected to further validation within two external validation sets.

resultsA total of 2,559 AP patients were included. There were 12-26 variables selected for model training. Among the six ML models under assessment, the Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) models exhibited relatively superior performance in predicting in-hospital mortality, mortality within 180/365 days after discharge. Findings from the decision curve analysis and two external validation sets further indicated that the XGB model exhibited the optimal performance in predicting the in-hospital mortality of AP patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Specifically, the XGB model demonstrated stability in the area under the curve across different centers, achieved a balance between sensitivity and specificity, and effectively prevented overfitting through regularization mechanisms. These features are highly congruent with the core requirements for robustness in the medical context.

conclusionsBy collecting the dynamic variables of patients during their hospitalization and establishing an XGB model, it is conducive to identifying the short-term and long-term prognoses of AP patients and promoting the decision-making of clinicians. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPancreatitisPatient ReadmissionAcute DiseaseAdultAgedChinaFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAcute pancreatitiseICUIn-hospital mortalityMachine learningMIMICPrediction model

Identifiers

PMID40646492
PMCPMC12247377

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.