Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40647132›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Entomophagy: Nutritional Value, Benefits, Regulation and Food Safety.

Noélia A Pinheiro, Liliana J G Silva, Angelina Pena, André M P T Pereira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noélia A PinheiroLAQV, REQUIMTE, Laboratory of Bromatology and Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Polo III, Azinhaga de Stª Comba, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0009-4396-5359
Liliana J G SilvaLAQV, REQUIMTE, Laboratory of Bromatology and Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Polo III, Azinhaga de Stª Comba, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2372-1874
Angelina PenaLAQV, REQUIMTE, Laboratory of Bromatology and Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Polo III, Azinhaga de Stª Comba, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0902-647X
André M P T PereiraLAQV, REQUIMTE, Laboratory of Bromatology and Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Polo III, Azinhaga de Stª Comba, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4777-4340

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/50006/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The consumption of insects as food is an ancient practice that remains widespread in many regions of Asia, Africa, Latin America, and Oceania. However, this tradition has largely disappeared in Western countries, where it is often met with aversion. Nutritionally, insects can contain up to 60-70% protein (dry weight), along with beneficial fats, minerals, and vitamins, making them comparable to commonly consumed protein sources. Additionally, they contain bioactive compounds that offer health benefits and can contribute to reducing social inequalities in food access. As a sustainable protein source, insects have the potential to meet the demands of a projected global population of 9.7 billion by 2050. From a regulatory perspective, legislation on edible insects is still emerging in many parts of the world, with significant regional differences in the approval process, safety requirements, and permitted species. However, ensuring their safety-particularly in terms of production, preservation, storage, and potential health risks-is crucial. By addressing these concerns, it may be possible to shift the prevailing negative perception in Western societies and enhance consumer acceptance. Thus, we performed a literature review encompassing several issues regarding entomophagy, like insects' nutritional composition, legislation, benefits, and food safety, and also addressing future perspectives.

Indexed as

food hazardsfood safetyhealth benefitsnutritional compositionregulatory framework

Identifiers

PMID40647132
PMCPMC12249221

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.