Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40647265›Full record

ReviewNutrients2025

Advancements in Family-Based Treatment of Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa: A Review of Access Barriers and Telehealth Solutions.

Ashlea Hambleton, Daniel Le Grange, Stephen Touyz, Sarah Maguire

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neural circuits regulating activity-based anorexia.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashlea HambletonInsideOut Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6912-0911
Daniel Le GrangeUCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7293-9496
Stephen TouyzInsideOut Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.
Sarah MaguireInsideOut Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0754-9189

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a psychiatric illness with serious medical and physiological implications. Anorexia Nervosa is characterised by significant disruptions in weight, growth and physical health resulting from disordered behaviours such as food restriction, purging and inappropriate exercise. The illness is associated with substantial physical, psychological, social and economic burdens affecting all areas of functioning. Typically emerging in adolescence, AN can have a chronic course and high risk of mortality, with evidence suggesting that approximately 10% of individuals diagnosed with AN will die from medical complications or completed suicide. Whilst inpatient treatment reduces mortality risks through nutritional and weight restoration, outpatient treatment is the preferred level of intervention. In the case of adolescents, family-based treatment (FBT) is the recommended and most researched outpatient model for medically stable adolescents. However, access to FBT is limited, and there are several barriers that exist to receiving care from trained clinicians. This review provides a literature update on studies reporting the real-world access challenges for FBT, with particular attention paid to non-research settings. The review also highlights how digitally delivered treatment, specifically telehealth, has been used to increase access to FBT and examines the preliminary outcomes of telehealth-delivered FBT, which appear comparable to traditional in-person care. Despite these promising findings, provider, intervention and systemic factors have challenged the delivery of traditional in-person and telehealth FBT in real-world settings. Critical areas for future research include the need to understand the impact of potential confounders and what adaptions may be required to increase model feasibility in community settings, where access to specialist services is often limited and access challenges are most felt.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaFamily TherapyHealth Services AccessibilityTelemedicineAdolescentFemaleHumansanorexiafamily-based treatmenttelehealth

Identifiers

PMID40647265
PMCPMC12251306

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.