SynthesisNutrients2025
E-Health and M-Health in Obesity Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs.
Synthesis in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Digital Tools on Lifestyle & Health-Related Outcomes Across the Full Continuum of the Maternal Journey: A Systematic Review.Current obesity reports · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Mobile Health for Improving Medication Adherence in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of mindfulness-based digital health interventions on BMI and weight-related behaviours in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Associations between dietary glycemic and insulinemic patterns and eating behavior in adults: a cluster-based analysis.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Article
- Digital health technologies in obesity: trajectory, emerging hotspots, and future perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Evaluating the influence of persuasive systems design on continuance intention, perceived effectiveness, and weight loss.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity in adults is a growing health concern. The principal interventions used in obesity management are lifestyle-change interventions such as diet, exercise, and behavioral therapy. Although they are effective, current treatment options have not succeeded in halting the global rise in the prevalence of obesity or achieving sustained long-term weight maintenance at the population level. E-health and m-health are both integral components of digital health that focus on the use of technology to improve healthcare delivery and outcomes. The use of eHealth/mHealth might improve the management of some of these treatments. Several digital health interventions to manage obesity are currently in clinical trials.
objectiveThe aim of our systematic review is to evaluate whether digital health interventions (e-Health and m-Health) have effects on changes in anthropometric measures, such as weight, BMI, and waist circumference and behaviors such as energy intake, eating behaviors, and physical activity.
methodsA search was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted through 4 October 2024 through three databases (Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus). Studies were included if they evaluated digital health interventions (e-Health and m-Health) compared to control groups in overweight or obese adults (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m
resultsTwenty-two RCTs involving diverse populations (obese adults, overweight individuals, postpartum women, patients with eating disorders) were included. Digital interventions included biofeedback devices, smartphone apps, e-coaching systems, web-based interventions, and mixed approaches. Only waist circumference showed a statistically significant reduction (WMD = -1.77 cm; 95% CI: -3.10 to -0.44;
conclusionsDigital health interventions produce modest but significant benefits on waist circumference in overweight and obese adults, without significant effects on other anthropometric or behavioral parameters. The high heterogeneity observed underscores the need for more personalized approaches and future research focused on identifying the most effective components of digital interventions. Digital health interventions should be positioned as valuable adjuncts to, rather than replacements for, established obesity treatments. Their integration within comprehensive care models may enhance traditional interventions through continuous monitoring, real-time feedback, and improved accessibility, but interventions with proven efficacy such as behavioral counseling and clinical oversight should be maintained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.