Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40647304›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2025

E-Health and M-Health in Obesity Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs.

Manuela Chiavarini, Irene Giacchetta, Patrizia Rosignoli, Roberto Fabiani

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manuela ChiavariniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3551-7486
Irene GiacchettaLocal Health Unit of Bologna, Department of Hospital Network, Hospital Management of Maggiore and Bellaria, 40124 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4646-5332
Patrizia RosignoliDepartment of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8703-3248
Roberto FabianiDepartment of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4865-9413

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity in adults is a growing health concern. The principal interventions used in obesity management are lifestyle-change interventions such as diet, exercise, and behavioral therapy. Although they are effective, current treatment options have not succeeded in halting the global rise in the prevalence of obesity or achieving sustained long-term weight maintenance at the population level. E-health and m-health are both integral components of digital health that focus on the use of technology to improve healthcare delivery and outcomes. The use of eHealth/mHealth might improve the management of some of these treatments. Several digital health interventions to manage obesity are currently in clinical trials.

objectiveThe aim of our systematic review is to evaluate whether digital health interventions (e-Health and m-Health) have effects on changes in anthropometric measures, such as weight, BMI, and waist circumference and behaviors such as energy intake, eating behaviors, and physical activity.

methodsA search was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted through 4 October 2024 through three databases (Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus). Studies were included if they evaluated digital health interventions (e-Health and m-Health) compared to control groups in overweight or obese adults (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m

resultsTwenty-two RCTs involving diverse populations (obese adults, overweight individuals, postpartum women, patients with eating disorders) were included. Digital interventions included biofeedback devices, smartphone apps, e-coaching systems, web-based interventions, and mixed approaches. Only waist circumference showed a statistically significant reduction (WMD = -1.77 cm; 95% CI: -3.10 to -0.44;

conclusionsDigital health interventions produce modest but significant benefits on waist circumference in overweight and obese adults, without significant effects on other anthropometric or behavioral parameters. The high heterogeneity observed underscores the need for more personalized approaches and future research focused on identifying the most effective components of digital interventions. Digital health interventions should be positioned as valuable adjuncts to, rather than replacements for, established obesity treatments. Their integration within comprehensive care models may enhance traditional interventions through continuous monitoring, real-time feedback, and improved accessibility, but interventions with proven efficacy such as behavioral counseling and clinical oversight should be maintained.

Indexed as

ObesityObesity ManagementTelemedicineAdultBehavior TherapyBody Mass IndexExerciseFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as Topice-healthmanagementm-healthobesitysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40647304
PMCPMC12251417

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.