ReviewCancers2025
The Evolving Landscape of GEP-NENs in the Era of Precision Oncology: Molecular Insights into Tumor Heterogeneity.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are a varied group of tumors that originate from neuroendocrine cells found throughout the gastrointestinal tract. These tumors encompass a broad spectrum of biological behaviors, ranging from slow-growing, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) to aggressive and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NECs), complicating their accurate classification and effective treatment. While advances in molecular research have refined our understanding of these tumors, their complexity, unpredictable progression, and differential response to therapies remain major clinical hurdles. A significant clinical challenge is the accurate grading and diagnosis of GEP-NENs, which is traditionally reliant on subjective methods. However, innovative technologies, such as artificial intelligence-based diagnostics, multi-omics approaches, and precision oncology, are now offering solutions for more precise and reliable classification. Meanwhile, emerging therapies aiming to activate the immune response or modify the tumor environment present promising avenues for improved outcomes. Realizing the full potential of these advances will require a thoughtful integration of molecular insights with standardized diagnostic practices and evolving therapeutic strategies, ensuring that progress in research meaningfully informs and enhances patient care across diverse clinical settings. This review discusses new advancements and explores future directions toward personalized and effective treatments for GEP-NENs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.