ReviewCancers2025
Efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Pre-Transplant Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy With Tumor Response and Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study of 427 Patients.World journal of surgery · 2026Observational
- Current advances and future directions in the management of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma.Gastroenterology report · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, its survival benefits remain unsatisfactory. In this systematic review, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with TACE and TACE alone in patients with intermediate-stage HCC.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TACE plus TKIs with TACE alone in patients with HCC were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Secondary outcomes included the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), which were analyzed using risk ratios (RRs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the
resultsFourteen RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to TACE alone, TACE plus TKIs significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.59-0.93,
conclusionsCompared with TACE alone, TACE combined with TKIs can significantly improve PFS and the ORR in patients with intermediate-stage HCC. Furthermore, combination treatment can significantly improve OS in patients with HBV infection, but not in patients with HCV infection. Further research is required to optimize patient selection and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.