ReviewCancers2025
Glioblastoma: Overview of Proteomic Investigations and Biobank Approaches for the Development of a Multidisciplinary Translational Network.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive, infiltrative brain tumor of the central nervous system (CNS). Its extensive molecular and biochemical heterogenicity hinders the identification of reliable biomarkers and therapeutic targets, thereby making prognosis and existing therapy ineffective. In recent years, breakthroughs in the use of proteomics on a range of biological samples, such as plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), tissues, brain cells, and exosomes, represent a potential improvement to GBM investigations. Mass spectrometry-based approaches represent an important technique in the characterization of the tumoral proteome, for the identification of differentially expressed proteins, and for studying altered molecular pathways involved in tumor stages. Proteomics studies advance our knowledge about GBM pathogenesis, the discovery of reliable diagnostic and prognostic markers, and therapeutic approaches, also. In this context, for the effective application of proteomics on GBM, it is mandatory to develop a translational network by integrating hospitals, biobanks, and research institutions into a single network, to enable a collaborative approach across disciplines, thereby enabling rapid translation to clinical application of new proteomic insights. Today, high-quality biobanks play a key role in enabling collaborative, ethically compliant research, supporting the effective application of proteomics in glioblastoma studies and the translation of discoveries into clinical practice. This review explores current trends in proteomics and GBM research, highlighting how leveraging biobank infrastructure and fostering institutional cooperation can drive the development of targeted pilot projects to enhance the impact and effectiveness of glioblastoma research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.