ArticleCancers2025
Bridging the Gap Between Accuracy and Efficiency in AI-Based Breast Cancer Diagnosis from Histopathological Data.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MSWA-ResNet: Multi-Scale Wavelet Attention for Patient-Level and Interpretable Breast Cancer Histopathology Classification.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- A Generative Expert-Narrated Simplification Model for Enhancing Health Literacy Among the Older Population.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Breast cancer diagnosis using histopathological images remains a critical yet challenging task in computational pathology due to overlapping visual features between benign and malignant tissues, inconsistencies in staining, and variations in magnification. The objective of this study was to design a lightweight yet high-performing deep learning model that bridges the gap between diagnostic accuracy and computational efficiency. Methods: We propose CellSage, a novel convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture enhanced with attention mechanisms. It integrates three core modules: a multi-scale feature extraction unit designed to capture both global and local tissue patterns; a depthwise separable convolution block for reducing computational load; and a Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) to dynamically focus on diagnostically relevant regions. The model was trained and evaluated on the BreakHis dataset, using stain normalization (via contrastive augmentation modeling, CAM) and extensive data augmentation techniques. A patient-wise cross-validation strategy was employed to ensure robust generalization. Results: CellSage achieved 94.8% accuracy, a 0.93 F1 score, and a 0.96 AUC, while remaining compact at only 3.8 million parameters. It outperformed deeper and larger models such as ResNet-50, DenseNet-121, and Vision Transformers in terms of both predictive performance and computational efficiency. Ablation studies confirmed that multi-scale feature extraction and attention refinement were critical components. Conclusions: CellSage is an interpretable, reliable, and computationally lightweight system for breast cancer diagnosis using histopathological data. Its efficiency and low computational footprint render it an ideal candidate for real-time deployment on digital pathology platforms, particularly in environments with limited computational infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.