ReviewCancers2025
A Review of Emerging Immunotherapeutic Strategies for IDH-Mutant Glioma.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding myeloid heterogeneity in glioblastoma: spatial insights from transcriptomics.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
IDH-mutant gliomas (IMGs) are a unique subset of diffuse gliomas that follow a relatively indolent course compared to IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) but inevitably progress, often to a higher histologic grade. Current standard therapies, including surgery, chemoradiation, and the recently approved mutant IDH inhibitor (mIDHi) vorasidenib, provide limited disease control and are not curative. Given the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) driven by the mutant IDH enzyme and its associated oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), novel immunotherapies offer a promising avenue for treatment. The goal of this paper is to review the main immunologic characteristics that distinguish IMG from GBM, including reduced T cell infiltration and function, fewer myeloid cells, and increased immune-dampening signaling. We also evaluate the preclinical and clinical evidence for immunotherapeutic approaches with the most potential to induce meaningful clinical activity, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR T cells, tumor vaccines, myeloid redirection, and oncolytic viruses. Despite significant advances in immunotherapy for IMG, fundamental questions persist, including optimal timing and combination strategies, mechanisms underpinning treatment resistance, and strategies to overcome the suppressive microenvironment. Future exploration of these treatment modalities, with a focus on mitigating soluble immunosuppressive factors in the TME, enhancing in situ T cell persistence, and leveraging novel antigen targets, is critical for advancing the state of therapy for this presently incurable group of tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.