ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
MR Defecography Improves Diagnosis of Postoperative Pelvic Floor Dysfunction After Gynecological Surgery.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance defecography in differentiating evacuation disorders among patients with manometric dyssynergia.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Comparison of the effects of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy on ovarian reserve and sexual function: a non-randomised prospective study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Does age influence surgical technique in bowel endometriosis? A multicenter analysis of 1547 cases.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is one of the most significant postoperative consequences in gynecological surgery, leading to impaired bowel function, structural alteration, and reduced quality of life. The conventional technique using fluoroscopic defecography and perineal ultrasonography provides an incomplete assessment of multi-compartment defects and post-surgical changes. Magnetic resonance defecography (MRD) represents a valuable alternative imaging method in the assessment of PFD following gynecological surgery, increasing diagnostic accuracy and enabling personalized treatment planning. MRD achieves high-resolution multi-compartmental assessment of the pelvic floor in dynamic states. Particularly, it is able to detect postoperative complications such as mesh retraction, organ prolapse, and fistula formation, not visible to other modalities. This narrative review discusses the role of MRD in diagnosing PFD and its advantages in detecting functional and anatomical changes following gynecological surgery. This review also examined the ability of MRD to demonstrate surgical changes and its contribution to possible standardization in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.