ArticlePolymers2025
Post-Process Cytotoxicity of Resins in Clear Aligner Fabrication.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hygroscopic behaviour and colour stability of 3D-printed and thermoformed aligner materials: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Clear Aligners as a Prescribed Source of Unmeasured Intra-Oral Micro- and Nanoplastic Exposure: Release Mechanisms, Human Evidence, Salivary Biomonitoring and the EU Regulatory Context.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Assessment of cell viability of heat cured and 3D printed denture base resins on humans' oral epithelial cells, and rats' hepatic and myocardial cells.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Potential Cytotoxicity of Orthodontic Aligners in the Oral Environment: A Scoping Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Environmental Burden and Sustainability Challenges of Clear Aligners: Implications for Public Health, Practice, Policy, and Future Research-A Scoping Review.International journal of dentistry · 2026Review
- Effect of print orientation of 3D-printed aligner templates on the volumetric accuracy of transferred composite attachments: an in vitro study.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Biocompatibility and Safety of 3D Printing Resins for Orthodontic Aligners: A Critical Review of Current Evidence.Polymers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of two resin materials, Tera Harz TC-85 DAC and Clear-A, along with the effects of two different post-printing protocols applied to Clear-A. Samples were produced using the Ackuretta Sol printer. The following three groups were formed based on the resins used and the post-curing methods applied: Group 1: Tera Harz TC-85 DAC resin + Tera Harz Cure; Group 2: Clear-A resin + Curie machine; and Group 3: Clear-A resin + Tera Harz Cure. All samples were sterilized in 70% ethanol for 5 min, rinsed with sterile deionized water, and incubated in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium at 37 °C for 72 h. Cytotoxicity assessment was performed by the XTT and RTCA methods using the human gingival fibroblast cell line. According to the XTT assay, undiluted resin extracts exhibited approximately 75-80% cell viability at 24 h, while further dilutions resulted in a viability exceeding 90%. No significant differences in viability were observed among the groups at any dilution at 48 and 72 h. The xCELLigence RTCA results aligned with the XTT findings, showing a transient decrease in cell viability within the first 24 h, followed by continued cell growth. This study demonstrated that extracts from all tested 3D-printed resins exhibited biocompatibility with human gingival fibroblasts. These findings support their potential for further applications in the dental and biomedical fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.