ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Towards the Operationalization of Health Technology Sustainability Assessment and the Early Eco Design of the Internet of Medical Things.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An increasing number of scholars are raising concerns about the sustainability of digital health, calling for action to prevent its harmful effects on the environment. At this point, however, the comprehensive appraisal of emerging technology in the health sector remains theoretically challenging, and highly difficult to implement in practice and in ecological design. Indeed, background factors such as the rapid evolution of technology or effectiveness-efficiency tradeoffs complicate the task of distinguishing the benefits of digital health from its drawbacks, rendering early Health Technology Sustainability Assessment (HTSA) extremely complex. Within this context, the aim of this article is to draw attention to the pragmatism that should be adopted when anticipating the sustainability of technological innovation in the medical field, while simultaneously proposing an assessment framework grounded in a structural and conceptual dissection of the fundamental purpose of smart technologies and the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT). Building on this, we demonstrate how our framework can be strategically applied through a rapid back-of-the-envelope assessment of the economic and ecological balance when introducing IoMT prototypes for treating a specific condition, based on a preliminary simulation of a defined clinical outcome. In this manner, the article presents evidence that challenges two primary hypotheses, and also encourages reflection on the central role of information and its interpretation when addressing key barriers in the HTSA of digital health. Thereby, it contributes to advancing cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness evaluation tools that support eco design strategies and guide informed decision-making regarding the integration of sustainable IoMT systems into healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.