ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Novel Deep Learning Model for Human Skeleton Estimation Using FMCW Radar.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human skeleton estimation using Frequency-Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) radar is a promising approach for privacy-preserving motion analysis. However, the existing methods struggle with sparse radar point cloud data, leading to inaccuracies in joint localization. To address this challenge, we propose a novel deep learning framework integrating convolutional neural networks (CNNs), multi-head transformers, and Bi-LSTM networks to enhance spatiotemporal feature representations. Our approach introduces a frame concatenation strategy that improves data quality before processing through the neural network pipeline. Experimental evaluations on the MARS dataset demonstrate that our model outperforms conventional methods by significantly reducing estimation errors, achieving a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.77 cm and a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 2.92 cm while maintaining computational efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.