ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Comprehensive Methodological Survey of Human Activity Recognition Across Diverse Data Modalities.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deployment-Oriented Evaluation of Lightweight IMU-Based Human Activity Recognition: On-Device Efficiency and Streaming Feasibility.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Human motion recognition based on progressive neural architecture search for efficient and interpretable spatiotemporal learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research of Fall Detection and Fall Prevention Technologies: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Deep Learning Algorithms for Human Activity Recognition in Manual Material Handling Tasks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Human Activity Recognition with Noise-Injected Time-Distributed AlexNet.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A novel YOLO LSTM approach for enhanced human action recognition in video sequences.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing human activity recognition with machine learning: insights from smartphone accelerometer and magnetometer data.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human Activity Recognition (HAR) systems aim to understand human behavior and assign a label to each action, attracting significant attention in computer vision due to their wide range of applications. HAR can leverage various data modalities, such as RGB images and video, skeleton, depth, infrared, point cloud, event stream, audio, acceleration, and radar signals. Each modality provides unique and complementary information suited to different application scenarios. Consequently, numerous studies have investigated diverse approaches for HAR using these modalities. This survey includes only peer-reviewed research papers published in English to ensure linguistic consistency and academic integrity. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of the latest advancements in HAR from 2014 to 2025, focusing on Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) approaches categorized by input data modalities. We review both single-modality and multi-modality techniques, highlighting fusion-based and co-learning frameworks. Additionally, we cover advancements in hand-crafted action features, methods for recognizing human-object interactions, and activity detection. Our survey includes a detailed dataset description for each modality, as well as a summary of the latest HAR systems, accompanied by a mathematical derivation for evaluating the deep learning model for each modality, and it also provides comparative results on benchmark datasets. Finally, we provide insightful observations and propose effective future research directions in HAR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.