Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40648443›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Near-Field Microwave Sensing for Chip-Level Tamper Detection.

Maryam Saadat Safa, Shahin Tajik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maryam Saadat SafaElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA.
Shahin TajikElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3752-2358

Funding

National Science Foundation CNS-2338069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stealthy chip-level tamper attacks, such as hardware Trojan insertions or security-critical circuit modifications, can threaten modern microelectronic systems' security. While traditional inspection and side-channel methods offer potential for tamper detection, they may not reliably detect all forms of attacks and often face practical limitations in terms of scalability, accuracy, or applicability. This work introduces a non-invasive, contactless tamper detection method employing a complementary split-ring resonator (CSRR). CSRRs, which are typically deployed for non-destructive material characterization, can be placed on the surface of the chip's package to detect subtle variations in the impedance of the chip's power delivery network (PDN) caused by tampering. The changes in the PDN's impedance profile perturb the local electric near field and consequently affect the sensor's impedance. These changes manifest as measurable variations in the sensor's scattering parameters. By monitoring these variations, our approach enables robust and cost-effective physical integrity verification requiring neither physical contact with the chips or printed circuit board (PCB) nor activation of the underlying malicious circuits. To validate our claims, we demonstrate the detection of various chip-level tamper events on an FPGA manufactured with 28 nm technology.

Indexed as

complementary split-ring resonator (CSRR)hardware Trojansimpedance characterizationnear-field sensingphysical layer securityscattering parameterstamper detection

Identifiers

PMID40648443
PMCPMC12252523

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.