ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Near-Field Microwave Sensing for Chip-Level Tamper Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stealthy chip-level tamper attacks, such as hardware Trojan insertions or security-critical circuit modifications, can threaten modern microelectronic systems' security. While traditional inspection and side-channel methods offer potential for tamper detection, they may not reliably detect all forms of attacks and often face practical limitations in terms of scalability, accuracy, or applicability. This work introduces a non-invasive, contactless tamper detection method employing a complementary split-ring resonator (CSRR). CSRRs, which are typically deployed for non-destructive material characterization, can be placed on the surface of the chip's package to detect subtle variations in the impedance of the chip's power delivery network (PDN) caused by tampering. The changes in the PDN's impedance profile perturb the local electric near field and consequently affect the sensor's impedance. These changes manifest as measurable variations in the sensor's scattering parameters. By monitoring these variations, our approach enables robust and cost-effective physical integrity verification requiring neither physical contact with the chips or printed circuit board (PCB) nor activation of the underlying malicious circuits. To validate our claims, we demonstrate the detection of various chip-level tamper events on an FPGA manufactured with 28 nm technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.