Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40648565›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Joachim Graf, Konstanze Weinert, Harald Abele, Angela Kranz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joachim GrafInstitute for Health Science, Department of Midwifery Science, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2208-0446
Konstanze WeinertInstitute for Health Science, Department of Midwifery Science, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Harald AbeleInstitute for Health Science, Department of Midwifery Science, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0429-7118
Angela KranzInstitute for Health Science, Department of Midwifery Science, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6849-3217

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy and birth are biological processes shaped by social factors, requiring sociological approaches to explain reproductive behaviour. This narrative review outlines the importance of health sociology against the background that health and illness behaviour is influenced by the social environment. The aim of this paper is to summarize the current state of research on the influence of social systems and social milieu behaviour on reproduction, pregnancy, and childbirth in order to make it easier for midwives and doctors to take these factors into account in their everyday clinical and outpatient work. First, the paper lays out the basics of how health and illness are socially constructed, looking at it from both a structural and action-oriented perspective. It then goes on to explain what this means for pregnancy and childbirth as social processes, how women's health is related to the social construction of gender roles, that breastfeeding is also a social process, and what conclusions can be drawn for the work of midwives. Pregnancy and birth are social processes based on norms and role attributions: "Decisions" regarding one's own reproductivity are usually only "self-determined" to a limited extent and tend to occur in the context of social norms and milieu-specific role expectations. The promotion of women's health depends on how milieu-specific norms and logics of action are understood. For all the professions involved in obstetrics, this results in the need for a critical examination of the sociological aspects of health. This implies the necessity for all obstetric professions to critically examine aspects of the sociology of health in order to provide women and their families with appropriate, evidence-based and client-centred care in the context of pregnancy, birth and the postpartum period, against the background of constant social change.

Indexed as

birth and breastfeedinghealth sociologymidwivesself-determination of reproductive decisionssocial construction of pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40648565
PMCPMC12248799

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.