ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Personalized Treatment Modalities for Rectal Cancer: Advances in Neoadjuvant Treatment.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Four-Year Survival Outcomes of Personalized Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Chemotherapy During the 'Wait Period' Versus Standard Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- Clinical progress and technological innovations in sphincter-preserving treatment for ultra-low rectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Locally advanced rectal cancer treatment has shifted toward personalized, risk-adapted strategies that balance oncologic control with functional preservation while minimizing toxicity. A multidisciplinary team approach is essential, tailoring treatment guided by individual patient risk factors and priorities. Traditional neoadjuvant chemoradiation and subsequent total mesorectal excision has improved local control, but concerns remain regarding systemic failure and treatment-related morbidity. Total neoadjuvant therapy is now widely considered a preferred approach for more advanced tumors, enhancing systemic control, improving chemotherapy compliance, and facilitating organ preservation in select patients. Recent studies highlight that response-based treatment adaptation allows for better patient stratification, with selected patients who respond well to preoperative chemotherapy potentially omitting radiation without compromising outcomes and omitting surgery for patients with complete clinical responses to chemoradiation and chemotherapy. Advances in molecular profiling, particularly in mismatch repair deficiency or microsatellite instability-high tumors, have enabled the implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors, permitting select patients to avoid both radiation and surgery, thereby reducing treatment-related toxicities. Future research should focus on validating predictive biomarkers, such as circulating tumor DNA, refining patient selection, and optimizing treatment monitoring while also developing novel therapeutic strategies to further personalize locally advanced rectal cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.