ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
COVID-19 and Myocarditis: Trends, Clinical Characteristics, and Future Directions.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Iron Deficiency as an Important Predictor of Arterial and Venous Thrombosis, Myocarditis, and Atrial Fibrillation in COVID-19 and Influenza.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Review
- Myocardial and Vascular Involvement in COVID-19 and Post-Vaccination States: Understanding Injury Pathways and Clinical Implications.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparison of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Myocarditis and Non-ICI Myocarditis Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Single-Centre Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has been associated with a range of cardiovascular complications, including myocarditis. This review aims to systematically present the clinical manifestations, underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic approaches, and management strategies for both COVID-19-associated myocarditis and myocarditis related to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We conducted a literature search using the PubMed database, covering studies published up to early 2024. Search terms included combinations of "COVID-19", "Coronavirus", "SARS-CoV-2", and/or "vaccination" with "cardiac injury", "cardiac inflammation", "myocarditis". The reported prevalence of COVID-19-associated myocarditis varies between 2.3% and 5.0%, though myocardial injury is more frequently observed than confirmed myocarditis. Pathophysiological mechanisms include direct viral damage, immune-mediated injury, and molecular mimicry. Clinically, patients may present with chest pain, dyspnea, and fever. Diagnostic workup includes electrocardiography (ECG), troponin measurement, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), and in selected cases, endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). The management and disposition of COVID-19-associated myocarditis varies according to severity, especially to allow targeted treatment of complications. Glucocorticoids are a mainstay of treatment in severe cases. Myocarditis following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is rare, more frequently reported in males under 30 years, and is generally associated with a favorable prognosis. Despite this, the benefits of vaccination continue to outweigh the risks. COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk of heart failure and other cardiovascular complications, underlining the importance of long-term follow-up and preventive strategies. Further research is needed to better understand the pathogenesis and optimal management of myocarditis in the context of COVID-19, with the goal of developing evidence-based therapeutic algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.