ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Co-Occurrence of Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease: Facing Challenges Before, During, and After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How to Individualize Coronary Assessment and Revascularization in Severe AS Patients Undergoing TAVI in the Era of Lifetime Management?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Concentration of Trace Elements in Patients with Aortic Stenosis and Coexisting Coronary Artery Disease: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the management of aortic stenosis (AS), leading to significant improvements in patient outcomes. Over time, advancements in device technology have further optimized safety and performance of TAVR. However, as the pool of low-risk patients undergoing TAVR expands, many of whom present with concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD), new challenges have emerged. A large proportion of TAVR candidates suffer from CAD, and the clinical implications of this comorbidity remain a subject of debate. Research on the relationship between AS and CAD has yielded conflicting results, but severe CAD is generally linked to worse outcomes in AS patients. The coexistence of AS and CAD complicates diagnosis and management, requiring a comprehensive understanding of both invasive and non-invasive diagnostic techniques, along with careful revascularization strategies. This review explores the prevalence, clinical impact, and diagnostic challenges of CAD in TAVR patients, highlighting emerging methods for its assessment. Key aspects of treatment, including the timing of coronary revascularization, coronary re-access after TAVR in different settings, as well as practical tips and tricks for coronary cannulation, are also discussed. The complexity of managing AS and CAD is further intensified by the need for individualized approaches, particularly in hybrid procedures and subsequent TAVR interventions. Ongoing research and technological innovations offer promising solutions for refining the management of CAD in AS patients undergoing TAVR, with an emphasis on improving prognostic accuracy, optimizing revascularization strategies, and enhancing post-procedural care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.