Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40649586›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Dynamic Statistical Mechanics Modeling of Percolation Networks in Conductive Polymer Composites for Smart Sensor Applications.

Sang-Un Kim, Joo-Yong Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sang-Un KimDepartment of Smart Wearable Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1648-0200
Joo-Yong KimDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1969-5730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conductive polymer composites (CPCs) are widely used in flexible electronics due to their tunable electrical properties and mechanical deformability. However, accurately predicting the evolution of conductive networks, particularly under compressive strain, remains a significant challenge. In this study, we developed a statistical mechanics model and an extended dynamic statistical mechanics model to quantitatively describe percolation behavior in CPCs. The static model incorporates filler geometry, aspect ratio (AR), and surface-to-volume ratio, and was validated using Monte Carlo simulations. Results show that the percolation threshold for spherical fillers was 0.11965, while significantly lower values of 0.00669 and 0.00203 were observed for plate- and rod-shaped fillers, respectively, confirming the enhanced connectivity of anisotropic particles. To capture strain-dependent behavior, a dynamic model was constructed using a Smoluchowski-type gain-loss framework. This model separates conductive network formation (gain) from network disconnection (loss) caused by filler alignment and Poisson-induced expansion. At high Poisson's ratios (0.3 and 0.5), the model accurately predicted the reduction in connectivity, particularly for anisotropic fillers. Across all tested conditions, the model exhibited strong agreement with simulation data, with RMSE values ranging from 0.0004 to 0.0449. The results confirm that high AR fillers enhance conductivity under compression, while large Poisson's ratios suppress network formation. These findings provide a reliable, physically grounded modeling framework for designing strain-sensitive devices such as flexible pressure sensors.

Indexed as

conductive polymer composites (CPCs)dynamic statistical mechanicsMonte Carlo simulationpercolation theory

Identifiers

PMID40649586
PMCPMC12251044

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.