Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40649700›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Antimicrobial Peptides in Wound Healing and Skin Regeneration: Dual Roles in Immunity and Microbial Defense.

Siti Balqis Adnan, Manira Maarof, Mh Busra Fauzi, Nur Izzah Md Fadilah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. In Vivo Wound Healing Effects of Antimicrobial Peptide-Based Dressings for S. aureus-Infected Wounds-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Siti Balqis AdnanDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (DTERM), Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Manira MaarofDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (DTERM), Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2154-7852
Mh Busra FauziDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (DTERM), Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-6449-639X
Nur Izzah Md FadilahDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (DTERM), Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-8991-1828

Funding

Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Sistem Modal Insan Bersepadu (SMIP)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although penicillin transformed antibiotic therapy, rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has limited its effectiveness, creating a need for new approaches in wound healing. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are promising candidates due to their rapid membrane-disrupting action, immunomodulatory effects, and ability to target drug-resistant pathogens, though their specific roles in promoting wound healing are still not fully understood. This review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the current evidence on the dual role of AMPs as both antimicrobial and immunomodulatory agents in the context of wound healing. Recent studies published between 2020 and 2025 were comprehensively reviewed, focusing on the mechanisms by which AMPs contribute to pathogen elimination, immune regulation, tissue repair, and inflammation resolution. AMPs not only exhibit rapid membrane-disruptive activities against a wide range of pathogens but also influence immune cell behavior, particularly by promoting macrophage polarization toward a reparative M2 phenotype, modulating cytokine and chemokine network, and maintaining T-cell homeostasis. Their ability to simultaneously control infection and regulate inflammation positions AMPs as promising candidates for advanced wound care strategies. The dual antimicrobial and immunomodulatory functions of AMPs represent a synergistic mechanism essential for effective wound recovery. Understanding and harnessing these properties can drive the development of innovative therapies, such as AMP-integrated smart biomaterials and targeted peptide delivery systems, offering new solutions for both acute and chronic wound management.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial PeptidesRegenerationSkinWound HealingAnimalsHumansAntimicrobial Peptidesantimicrobial peptidesimmune modulationskin regenerationtherapeutic applicationswound healing

Identifiers

PMID40649700
PMCPMC12249706

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.