ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Sex-Specific Differences in LPS-Induced Rapid Myocardial Dysfunction.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Special Issue "Molecular Mechanisms and Pathophysiology of Sepsis".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- The bidirectional regulatory mechanism of gut microbiota metabolites on myocardial injury in heart failure from the perspective of the gut-heart axis: a review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac dysfunction is a severe complication of sepsis that significantly increases mortality in affected patients. Previous studies have shown better myocardial responses with preserved cardiac function in female animals compared to males following lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sepsis. Our published findings have revealed that females exhibited less cardiac dysfunction than males when exposed to equivalent doses of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α, which is markedly elevated in both heart tissue and serum following LPS. These raise the question of whether the observed sex differences in LPS-induced myocardial dysfunction are a direct effect of LPS or a secondary consequence mediated by inflammatory cytokines, like TNFα. In this study, we aimed to uncover sex differences in LPS-caused direct effects on cardiac function. To do so, isolated hearts from aged-matched adult male and female mice were subjected to LPS infusion using a Langendorff method. Left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) was continuously recorded. The female estrous cycle was determined via vaginal smear. The oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) pathway and estrogen receptors (ERs) were determined in heart tissue using Western blot. We found that males exhibited worse LV function than females following the infusion of LPS at 5.0 mg/kg body weight. However, no significant differences in cardiac function and expression of ERs were observed between female groups at different estrous stages. Interestingly, LV function returned to baseline after the initial depression of LVDP during the rapid response to LPS and then depressed again following the 50 min LPS infusion. Protein levels of OXPHOS were altered differently between male and female hearts after 50 min LPS infusion. Our data demonstrate that male hearts exhibit higher sensitivity to LPS-induced rapid cardiac dysfunction compared to females, although estrogen may have a minimal influence on LPS-induced rapid functional depression. Sex differences may exist in myocardial mitochondrial responses to direct LPS insult via the OXPHOS pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.