Experimental Models and Their Applicability in Inflammation Studies: Rodents, Fish, and Nematodes.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Cross-Species Conservation and Function of ALDH6A1/Aldh6a1 Validate Zebrafish and Mouse as Complementary Experimental Systems for Methylmalonate Semialdehyde Dehydrogenase Deficiency.Biology · 2026
   Article
2. From Xenobiotic Exposure to Neuroinflammation: Mechanisms Linking Lipopolysaccharide Signaling to Depressive-like Behavior.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026
   Review
3. Preclinical PET and SPECT Imaging in Small Animals: Technologies, Challenges and Translational Impact.Cells · 2025
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as