ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Echocardiographic Assessment of Cardiac Function in Mouse Models of Heart Disease.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of pericardial disruption on heart function and remodeling after myocardial infarction in mice.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Addressing Key Limitations of Diastolic Function Assessment in Mouse Echocardiography by Enabling Robust Retrospective Analysis From a Standard Imaging View.Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- An Integrated Evaluation Framework for Adult Heart Regeneration.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Effects of heart rate on cardiac function in normal mice and rats and in animal models of heart failure.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Mechanical Stress Triggers Premature Senescence in Cardiac Fibroblasts.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Characterization of Infarct Size and Remodeling Using CMR and PET in Mice Models of Reperfused and Non-Reperfused Myocardial Infarction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Low- and high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide attenuates graft-versus-host disease with distinct effects on PD-1+ T cell subsets.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2025Article
- Echocardiographic assessment and new advances of right ventricle function in rats with pulmonary hypertension.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Regenerative and molecular therapies for myocardial repair (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Echocardiography is a cornerstone technique for evaluating cardiac function in preclinical research using murine models. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the echocardiographic approaches employed to assess ventricular function in mouse models of heart disease, highlighting methodological principles, technical challenges, and the translational relevance of findings. Various echocardiographic modalities enable the precise evaluation of systolic and diastolic function. This article emphasizes standardization in image acquisition and analysis to minimize inter-operator variability and ensure reproducibility. It details echocardiographic parameters and strain imaging across commonly used mouse models of non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, diabetic cardiomyopathy, hypertensive heart disease, and ischemic heart disease. Furthermore, it explores the advantages and limitations of anesthesia, probe positioning, and physiological monitoring during imaging. The integration of advanced imaging technologies such as Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography (STE), Three-Dimensional (3-D), and Four-Dimensional (4-D) echocardiography is discussed as a promising avenue for enhancing data quality and improving the translational potential of preclinical cardiac studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.