SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Differentially Expressed Proteins in Cerebrospinal Fluid Associated with Multiple Sclerosis.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To advance our understanding of multiple sclerosis (MS), accurate identification of protein expression profiles as biomarkers for MS in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is critical. However, proteomic studies investigating MS have yielded inconsistent findings due to variability in sample sizes, diagnostic criteria, and data processing methods. We aimed to tackle these challenges by performing a thorough meta-analysis of proteomics datasets sourced from multiple independent studies. We conducted a thorough database search to gather all relevant studies using appropriate keywords. We screened articles using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and finally, six studies were included. We retrieved and combined data from five CSF datasets for discovery and two additional datasets for validation in 368 MS patients and controls. After data preprocessing, we calculated Z-scores for all datasets and for the integrated dataset. We used logistic regression models using training and validation datasets. We identified 11 differentially expressed proteins in the integrated dataset, revealing significant alterations in key pathways involved in immune response, neuroinflammation, and synaptic function. Notably, IGKC exhibited strong diagnostic potential, with an AUROC of 0.81. These findings highlight the value of re-analysing publicly available proteomics data to develop robust biomarker panels for MS diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.