SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Unlocking the Potential of Spheroids in Personalized Medicine: A Systematic Review of Seeding Methodologies.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hepatic stellate cells promote structural and functional remodeling of three-dimensional hepatocellular carcinoma coculture spheroids.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Effects of helium cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) on HT-29 cancer stem cell spheroid.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Three-dimensional culture of tumor cells (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- In Vitro 3D Model of Human Endometrial Stromal and Trophoblast Cells: Techniques for an Optimized Formation and Cryopreservation of Spheroids.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- Polydopamine-Coated Surfaces Promote Adhesion, Migration, Proliferation, Chemoresistance, Stemness, and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Human Prostate Cancer Cell Lines In Vitro via Integrin αInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) spheroid models have revolutionized in vitro cancer research by offering more physiologically relevant alternatives to traditional two-dimensional (2D) cultures. A systematic search identifies English-language studies on patient-derived cancer spheroids for drug screening, using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, with data extracted on cancer type, culture methods, spheroid characteristics, and therapeutic responses. This manuscript evaluates the methods for spheroid formation and the cellular sources used, highlighting the diverse applications and preferences in this field. The five most investigated cancer origins for spheroid seeding are breast, colon, lung, ovary, and brain cancers, reflecting their clinical importance and research focus. Among seeding methodologies, forced-floating and scaffold-based methods predominate, demonstrating reliability and versatility in spheroid generation. Other techniques, including microfluidics, bioprinting, hanging drop, and suspension culture also play significant roles, each with distinct advantages and limitations. This review underscores the increasing use of spheroid models and the need for standardization in methodologies to enhance the reproducibility and translational potential in cancer research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.