Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40650254›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Unlocking the Potential of Spheroids in Personalized Medicine: A Systematic Review of Seeding Methodologies.

Karolina M Lonkwic, Radosław Zajdel, Krzysztof Kaczka

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karolina M LonkwicClinic of General and Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1003-5752
Radosław ZajdelDepartment of Economic and Medical Informatics, University of Lodz, 90-214 Lodz, Poland.
Krzysztof KaczkaClinic of General and Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) spheroid models have revolutionized in vitro cancer research by offering more physiologically relevant alternatives to traditional two-dimensional (2D) cultures. A systematic search identifies English-language studies on patient-derived cancer spheroids for drug screening, using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, with data extracted on cancer type, culture methods, spheroid characteristics, and therapeutic responses. This manuscript evaluates the methods for spheroid formation and the cellular sources used, highlighting the diverse applications and preferences in this field. The five most investigated cancer origins for spheroid seeding are breast, colon, lung, ovary, and brain cancers, reflecting their clinical importance and research focus. Among seeding methodologies, forced-floating and scaffold-based methods predominate, demonstrating reliability and versatility in spheroid generation. Other techniques, including microfluidics, bioprinting, hanging drop, and suspension culture also play significant roles, each with distinct advantages and limitations. This review underscores the increasing use of spheroid models and the need for standardization in methodologies to enhance the reproducibility and translational potential in cancer research.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineSpheroids, CellularCell Culture Techniques, Three DimensionalHumans3D modelsdrug screeningorganoidspersonalized medicinespheroids

Identifiers

PMID40650254
PMCPMC12250032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.