ArticleNature communications2025
Interplay between large low-recombining regions and pseudo-overdominance in a plant genome.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translating functional molecular knowledge into crop-breeding success.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Assembly and annotation of the 'Golden Delicious' Doubled-Haploid GDDH18 apple genome.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Estimating the additive genetic variance for relative fitness from changes in allele frequency.Genetics · 2026Article
- Article
- Genome-wide association study reveals genomic regions associated withFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To what extent overdominance might contribute to the maintenance of genetic diversity within genomes is still an ongoing research question. Pseudo-overdominance created by the complementation of deleterious alleles in heterozygotes has recently become a subject of particular interest. Simulations and theory suggest that pseudo-overdominance may occur in low recombining regions. Here, we conduct a comprehensive investigation of large low-recombining (LLR) regions in cultivated populations of pearl millet, an outcrossing diploid African cereal. We examine seven large regions ranging from 5 to 88 Mb and six of them are pericentromeric. These LLR regions exhibit an excess of heterozygotes, a distinctive hallmark of overdominance. They display a tendency toward a higher diversity and a larger ratio of non-synonymous and deleterious variants. We conduct a more in-depth study of the largest 88 Mb region, identified on chromosome 3. Interestingly, haplotypes of this region have been introgressed from wild relatives. Using long read sequencing, we confirm their strong divergence and the presence of inversions across one of them. One of the haplotypes seems to be highly deleterious in the homozygous state. A total of 17% of the cultivated pearl millet genome exhibit a local population structure suggestive of overdominance or possibly pseudo-overdominance. Our empirical results contribute to the accumulation of knowledge, which will enhance our understanding of the potential role of overdominance or pseudo-overdominance in maintaining genetic diversity, particularly in low recombining regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.