Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2025
Assessing FilmArray Pneumonia+ panel dynamics during antibiotic treatment to predict clinical success in ICU patients with ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: a multicenter prospective study.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic Escalation Following Rapid Multiplex PCR Pneumonia Panel Testing in Intensive Care Patients with Severe Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Current knowledge and challenges of sepsis-associated encephalopathy.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluating the Impact of Filmarray Pneumonia Plus Panel in Therapeutic Decision-Making in Critical Patients with Suspected Respiratory Infection.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Challenges and opportunities in the management of severe pneumonia. Key concepts from the Seventh Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2025.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Review
- Observational
- Duration Matters: Tailoring Antibiotic Therapy for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multiplex PCR panel dynamics: implications for therapy duration and methodological considerations.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Standardized pre-bronchoscopy mechanical power and KPC resistance as predictors of mortality in ventilated ICU patients: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate microbiological documentation seems central for managing severe pneumonia. While the FilmArray
methodsWe conducted a prospective observational study across four ICUs from April 2022 to June 2024, including patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) or ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia (vHAP). Bacterial loads were monitored on days 0, 1, 3, 7 and 10 and 3 days after stopping antibiotics, using endotracheal aspirates (ETAs) analyzed by FA-PP and standard cultures. The main objective was to assess the correlation between quantitative changes in FA-PP results and clinical success. Quantitative changes over time were analyzed using mixed ordinal logistic regression.
resultsOf the 93 patients enrolled, 60.2% (n = 56) achieved clinical success, while the ICU mortality rate was 25.8% (n = 24). Although FA-PP and culture quantification results declined over time (p < 0.0001), neither method consistently correlated with clinical success (non-significant for both). At diagnosis, FA-PP showed excellent diagnostic performance compared to culture, with a sensitivity of 94% [95% CI: 87-97] and a specificity of 98% [95% CI: 97-98]. Quantitative concordance improved with higher DNA copies, from 22.9% at the culture threshold at 10⁴ DNA copies/ml in FA-PP to 100% at ≥ 10⁷ DNA copies/ml. Diagnostic performance remained stable during antibiotic treatment with 94% sensitivity and 95% specificity in follow-up ETAs.
conclusionsFA-PP provides rapid and accurate diagnostics, but repeated testing did not predict clinical outcomes during treatment, however our small sample size limited the study power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.