ReviewActa haematologica2026
Complexities of Measurable Residual Disease Assays in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Guide for the Practicing Clinician.
Review in Acta haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Next-Generation Sequencing for Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Technological Advances, Clinical Translations and Current Challenges.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
<p>Background: Assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment is an internal component of prognostication and management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A range of assays - differing in sensitivity, complexity, and clinical application - are available. As these technologies advance, clinicians face new challenges in selecting and interpreting MRD tests. Summary: MRD testing is essential for risk stratification and treatment guidance in pediatric and adult ALL. Key assay platforms include multiparameter flow cytometry, quantitative PCR, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for clonal B- or T-cell receptor rearrangements. NGS MRD offers superior detection depth, especially in post-hematopoietic cell transplantation, and post-CAR T-cell therapy. In Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL, persistent BCR::ABL1 may represent non-leukemic clones, warranting the use of lineage-specific assays. While bone marrow remains the standard MRD source, assessment of MRD in blood and cerebrospinal fluid are gaining support in select contexts. MRD assessment in T-cell ALL remains complex due to antigen heterogeneity and infrequent clonal targets. Key Messages: This review provides a practical overview of MRD testing in ALL, comparing available technologies and highlighting clinical implications of assay selection, sensitivity, and sample type. </p>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.