Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40652938›Full record

ReviewActa haematologica2026

Complexities of Measurable Residual Disease Assays in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Guide for the Practicing Clinician.

Jerry Luo, Lori Muffly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jerry LuoDivision of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Lori MufflyDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA, lmuffly@stanford.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

<p>Background: Assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment is an internal component of prognostication and management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A range of assays - differing in sensitivity, complexity, and clinical application - are available. As these technologies advance, clinicians face new challenges in selecting and interpreting MRD tests. Summary: MRD testing is essential for risk stratification and treatment guidance in pediatric and adult ALL. Key assay platforms include multiparameter flow cytometry, quantitative PCR, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for clonal B- or T-cell receptor rearrangements. NGS MRD offers superior detection depth, especially in post-hematopoietic cell transplantation, and post-CAR T-cell therapy. In Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL, persistent BCR::ABL1 may represent non-leukemic clones, warranting the use of lineage-specific assays. While bone marrow remains the standard MRD source, assessment of MRD in blood and cerebrospinal fluid are gaining support in select contexts. MRD assessment in T-cell ALL remains complex due to antigen heterogeneity and infrequent clonal targets. Key Messages: This review provides a practical overview of MRD testing in ALL, comparing available technologies and highlighting clinical implications of assay selection, sensitivity, and sample type. </p>.

Indexed as

Neoplasm, ResidualPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaFlow CytometryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPrognosisAcute lymphoblastic leukemiaAllele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reactionMeasurable residual diseaseMultiparameter flow cytometryNext-generation sequencingPhiladelphia chromosome-positive leukemiaT-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Identifiers

PMID40652938
PMCPMC12503429

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.