ReviewBiological psychiatry2026
Mitigating Sex-Related Biases to Elucidate the Autism Phenotype.
Review in Biological psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is commonly considered a male-dominant condition, with epidemiological estimates finding that approximately 3 to 4 males are diagnosed for every female. An overwhelming majority of the studies used to establish this sex ratio were conducted with participants ascertained based on having first met clinical criteria, which may obscure qualitative differences between males and females and omits females who do not meet male-biased criteria. Our recently published data, which used a prospectively identified sample of children at high familial likelihood for ASD, corrected for sex-based measurement bias, and used data-driven groupings of behavior over time, were well suited to address this issue and suggest that the male:female ratio of autism-related concerns is closer to 1:1. In this review, we propose that research is needed that characterizes the autism phenotype, or behavioral expression of underlying genetic variation in autism-relevant traits. We describe shifts in sample ascertainment, methodological rigor, and the scope of traits examined that may help elucidate the autism phenotype. A research program that focuses on delineating the genetically related, biological determinants of clinical disorders has the potential to reveal the full expression of underlying genetic liability for ASD and improve early identification of ASD-related concerns in females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.