ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2025
The value of an ecological approach to address micronutrient malnutrition.
Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The equity and effectiveness of China's 2009 folic acid supplementation programme for long-term child development.Global health action · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The global public health context has become increasingly complex with the confluence of widespread infectious and noncommunicable diseases, and widespread food insecurity, which has led to alarming rates of hunger and multiple consequences of malnutrition. A key component of this complexity is prevalent deficiencies of micronutrients (MNs, i.e., essential vitamins and minerals), many of which have been overlooked in public health programs addressing malnutrition. Here, we lay out an approach to more comprehensively address this complexity by considering the interactions of internal (biology, health, and developmental context) and external (diet/food environment, social, economic, climate, and physical) environments on humans and their nutritional health, i.e., an ecology. We present a conceptual framework for applying this ecological perspective with foci on the following: 1) how to apply this approach to assessments that capture the complexity of the nutritional ecology; and 2) how to expand the understanding of the biology of MNs in biological systems and the environmental factors that influence them. Suggestions are included for a targeted clinical, public health, and research agenda to inform the development of context-specific nutritional assessment and interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.