ArticleGenome medicine2025
PGSFusion streamlines polygenic score construction and epidemiological applications in biobank-scale cohorts.
Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multiancestry and Multitrait GWAS Meta-Analysis on Schizophrenia With a Sample of 322,321 Unveils Genetic Links to Chronic Lung Diseases.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Cross-ancestry genetic architecture reveals shared biological pathways of major psychiatric disorders.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Cross-ancestry pleiotropic analysis of imaging-derived phenotypes enhances risk stratification of depression.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- PolyGenie: a reproducible Nextflow pipeline for phenome-wide association studies using polygenic risk scores.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Profiling the Onco-metabolic Nexus and Improving Cancer Risk Prediction Performance: A Large-scale Cohort and Genome-Wide Pleiotropic Analysis.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Empirical evaluation of analytic validity of polygenic scores.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Comprehensive benchmarking single and multi ancestry polygenic score methods with the PGS-hub platform.Nature communications · 2026Article
- GENEasso: a curated resource of credible disease-gene associations across complex diseases from GWAS summary statistics.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- DisCP-Atlas: a comprehensive resource mapping cellular processes to complex diseases.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- ProteoNexus: an integrative database to characterize genetic architecture, estimate mediation effects, and construct and evaluate prediction models of the plasma proteome.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- The Influence of Aerobic Exercise Therapy on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Concussion: A Scoping Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Clinical trials gain intelligence.Nature biotechnology · 2025Article
- Elucidation and application of the neuroimmune axis between depression and autoimmune diseases: A genome wide and cohort study.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe polygenic score (PGS) is an estimate of an individual's genetic susceptibility to a specific complex trait and has been instrumental to the development of precision medicine. As an increasing number of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have emerged, numerous sophisticated statistical and computational methods have been developed to facilitate the PGS construction. However, both the complex statistical estimation procedure and the various data formats of summary statistics and reference panel make the PGS calculation challenging and not easily accessible to researchers with limited statistical and computational backgrounds.
resultsHere, we propose PGSFusion, a webserver designed to carry out PGS construction for targeting variety of analytic requirements while requiring minimal prior computational knowledge. Implemented with well-established web development technologies, PGSFusion streamlines the construction of PGS using 17 PGS methods in four categories: 11 single-trait, one multiple-trait, two annotation-based and three cross-ancestry based methods. In addition, PGSFusion also utilizes UK Biobank data to provide two kinds of in-depth analyses for 201 complex traits: i) prediction performance evaluation to display the consistency between PGS and specific traits and the effect size of PGS in different genetic risk groups; ii) joint effect analysis to investigate the interaction between PGS and covariates, as well as the effect size of covariates in different genetic subgroups. PGSFusion benchmarks the prediction performances for different methods in one summary statistics. PGSFusion automatically identifies the required parameters in different data formats of uploaded GWAS summary statistics files, provides a selection of suitable methods, and outputs calculated PGSs and their corresponding epidemiological results. Finally, we showcase three case studies in different application scenarios, highlighting its versatility and values to researchers.
conclusionsOverall, PGSFusion presents an easy-to-use, effective, and extensible platform for PGS construction, promoting the accessibility and utility of PGS for researchers in the field of precision medicine. PGSFusion is freely available at http://www.pgsfusion.net/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.