ArticleScandinavian journal of public health2026
Advance directives in Finnish long-term care: Do sociodemographic characteristics and regional factors matter?
Article in Scandinavian journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvance directives (AD) help ensure quality end-of-life care by preventing inappropriate or unwanted treatments. This is particularly important for older people in long-term care (LTC).
aimsThis study examines sociodemographic and regional factors associated with the presence of ADs among Finnish round-the-clock LTC residents.
methodsThis retrospective register study included 6,090 Finnish round-the-clock LTC residents aged ⩾65 years who died of chronic progressive diseases in 2019 and had undergone a comprehensive evaluation of health status and care needs using a standardized, internationally accepted tool (interRAI instrument Minimum Data Set 2.0 for LTC).Regional differences and sociodemographic characteristics associated with the presence of a do-not-resuscitate order (DNR) or other ADs were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and multivariable logistic regression.
resultsThe most common advance directive was a DNR order (84.8%), while other ADs were less frequent (6.7-22.9%). Both DNR orders and other ADs were associated with female sex, Finnish as the native language, having a legal guardian, and dying of neurodegenerative diseases. The prevalence of DNR orders increased with age. ADs were more common in urban than rural municipalities, but there was substantial variation between municipalities (DNR: 70.9-95.0%, other ADs: 27.1-70.0%). Several associations of sociodemographic and regional factors with ADs remained significant after adjusting for functional ability and health stability.
conclusionsSociodemographic characteristics and regional factors influence whether Finnish long-term care residents have advance directives, regardless of their health status. This may result in unequal care and service use despite similar clinical conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.