ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Simultaneous particle tracking, phase retrieval and point spread function reconstruction.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D tracking and localization of particles, typically fluorescently labeled biomolecules, provides a direct means of monitoring cellular transport and communication. However, sample-induced wavefront distortions of emitted fluorescent light as it passes through the sample and onto the detector often yield point spread function (PSF) aberrations, presenting an important challenge to 3D particle tracking using pre-calibrated PSFs. PSF calibration is typically performed outside cellular samples, ignoring sample-induced aberrations, which can result in localization errors on the order of tens to hundreds of nanometers, ultimately compromising sub-diffraction limited tracking. In practice, correcting sample-induced aberrations currently requires sample-specific hardware adjustments, such as adaptive optics. Yet, information on sample-induced aberrations and PSF shape can be directly decoded from data collected using a 3D imaging setup. To this end, we propose a framework for simultaneous particle tracking, pupil function learning, and PSF reconstruction directly from the input data themselves. To accomplish this, we operate within a Bayesian paradigm, placing continuous 2D priors on all possible pupil phase and amplitudes warranted by the data without limiting ourselves to a finite Zernike set-thereby allowing capture of intricate pupil phase details. We benchmark our framework using a wide range of synthetic and experimental data from static to diffusing particles, and generalize to multiple diffusing particles with overlapping PSFs. Further, as a result of simultaneous particle tracking, phase retrieval, and PSF reconstruction, we retrieve the pupil phase with errors smaller than 10% under a range of realistic scenarios, while restoring sub-diffraction limited localization precisions of 10-25 nm and 20-50 nm in lateral and axial directions, respectively.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.