ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
Using pseudotime derivative on single-cell RNA sequencing data to identify genes undergoing cell cycle regulation.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: The cell cycle is a critical part of cellular life, one that has long been studied, both directly, and through its regulatory components. Commonly, cell cycle synchronization or selection experiments are performed in order to study the cell cycle, thus chemically modifying the cells, or selecting them for specific phases. We seek to develop a means to study the cell cycle through the use of single cell RNA sequencing, effectively circumventing the need for such experiments. Results: We utilize a well-established pseudotime method, along with the predicted and real expression of genes to calculate the velocity of individual genes. We then utilize statistics and expected biological behaviour to identify genes with significant shifts in velocity within the pseudotime. Additionally, we show the ability to observe gene regulatory behaviour such as mRNA splicing and degradation rates. As many cell line based research utilize multiple replicates we implement a merger method for technical replicates to adjust for technical variations, creating a more robust analysis. In summary, our study develops a robust approach to map the velocities of individual, biologically, and statistically significant genes throughout the cell cycle's phases within a cell line experiment. Availability and implementation: Data and code are available at: https://github.com/Ylefol/CC_vel.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.