Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40655264›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Greater psychological response and participation in knee-strenuous activity 8 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with generalised joint hypermobility who sustained a second anterior cruciate ligament injury: A cross-sectional registry study.

Jakob Lindskog, Axel Sundberg, Johan Högberg, Rebecca Hamrin Senorski, Ramana Piussi, Kristian Samuelsson, Roland Thomeé, Eric Hamrin Senorski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jakob LindskogUnit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9146-0073
Axel SundbergUnit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9543-3188
Johan HögbergUnit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7852-5603
Rebecca Hamrin SenorskiUnit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7025-7619
Ramana PiussiUnit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7586-5293
Kristian SamuelssonSahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center, Sahlgrenska Academy Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5383-3370
Roland ThomeéUnit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2801-5373
Eric Hamrin SenorskiUnit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9340-0147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare patients with generalised joint hypermobility (GJH) who sustained a second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury with those who did not sustain a second ACL injury, in terms of muscle strength, psychological response and level of knee-strenuous activity after primary ACL reconstruction. We hypothesised that patients who sustained a second ACL injury would display similar muscle strength symmetry, report similar psychological response and report greater levels of knee-strenuous activity compared to patients who did not sustain a second ACL injury. Methods: Data from a rehabilitation specific registry were extracted. Patients 15-30 years old with GJH, who sustained a second ACL injury after primary ACL reconstruction were matched 1:2 with patients with GJH who did not sustain a second ACL injury. Outcomes were compared at the 10-week, 4-, 8- and 12-month follow-ups after primary ACL reconstruction. Outcomes comprised limb symmetry index and peak torque relative to body weight for quadriceps and hamstrings muscle groups assessed seated isokinetically with a Biodex. In addition, the questionnaires knee self-efficacy scale Results: Thirty-two patients sustained a second ACL injury and were matched with 64 patients who did not. The mean age at time of ACL reconstruction was 19 ± 3 years, and 58 (60%) were female. There were no differences in muscle strength between groups at any follow-up. At the 8-month follow-up, patients with a second ACL injury reported higher on ACL-return to sport after Injury (65.6 ± 17.9 vs. 53.5 ± 17.3, Conclusion: Patients with GJH who sustained a second ACL injury reported greater confidence, lower negative emotions, and lesser risk appraisal towards return to sport, and reported greater levels of knee-strenuous activity at 8 months after primary ACL reconstruction compared to matched patients who did not sustain a second ACL injury. These findings might suggest that patients who report greater psychological readiness to RTS, that is, greater confidence, lower negative emotions and lesser risk appraisal, at 8 months, need more cautious guidance when increasing knee-strenuous activity. Level of Evidence: Level IV, cross-sectional study.

Indexed as

ACL reconstructionanterior cruciate ligamentgeneralised joint hypermobilityphysical evaluationpsychological evaluationre‐injuryrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40655264
PMCPMC12255941

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.