ArticleOphthalmology science
HORNBILL: A First-in-Human Phase I/IIa Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Early Pharmacodynamics of BI 764524 for Diabetic Macular Ischemia.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in diagnosing and treating diabetic retinopathy.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026Review
- Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Restored Capillary Perfusion on OCT Angiography in Diabetic Macular Ischemia.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- The Central Role of Oxidative Stress in Diabetic Retinopathy: Advances in Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To report safety and early pharmacodynamic results from a first-in-human trial of intravitreal (IVT) anti-semaphorin 3A antibody in participants with diabetic macular ischemia (DMI). Design: HORNBILL, a phase I/IIa study of BI 764524, comprised a nonrandomized, open-label, uncontrolled, single-rising-dose (SRD) and masked, randomized, sham-controlled, multiple-dose (MD) parts. Participants: Adults with DMI and stable diabetic retinopathy (DR) treated with pan-retinal photocoagulation and without center-involving diabetic macular edema. Methods: Twelve participants received single IVT doses of BI 764524 0.5 mg (n = 3), 1.0 mg (n = 3), or 2.5 mg (n = 6) in the SRD part. Thirty-one participants received 3 IVT doses of BI 764524 2.5 mg (n = 21) or sham procedures (n = 10) at 4-week intervals and were followed to week 22 in the MD part. Main Outcome Measures: The primary SRD end point was the number of participants with dose-limiting events; secondary end points assessed drug-related and ocular adverse events (AEs). The primary MD end point was the number of participants with drug-related AEs; secondary end points included changes from baseline in foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central subfield thickness (CST). Results: No dose-limiting events or drug-related AEs were reported with SRD; the highest tested dose (2.5 mg) was selected for the MD part. In the MD part, 2 investigator-assessed drug-related AEs (vitreous floaters and increased gamma-glutamyl transferase) were reported. No intraocular inflammation or occlusive retinal vasculitis cases occurred. At week 12 (4 weeks after the final injection), the adjusted mean FAZ area change was -0.004 mm Conclusions: HORNBILL met the primary safety end points; all evaluated BI 764524 doses were well tolerated. These findings support further investigation of BI 764524 in participants with DR and retinal nonperfusion. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.