ReviewNeuroscience applied2024
Therapeutic reference range for duloxetine in the treatment of depression revised: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Neuroscience applied, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A longitudinal PET study on changes in brain norepinephrine transporter availability following duloxetine treatment in major depressive disorder.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025Trial
- Dose-Concentration Relationship and Clinical Outcomes of Duloxetine in Generalized Anxiety Disorder.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concentration-effect relationship for the serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor duloxetine forms the basis of its therapeutic concentration reference range. However, it lacks systematic investigation and the range reported in the present therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines can only be considered preliminary. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in four databases to determine the optimal target concentration for duloxetine's antidepressant effects and to identify factors that influence its blood concentrations. Relevant articles reporting duloxetine blood concentrations in relation to i) clinical effects/adverse effects, ii) pharmacokinetics and iii) receptor occupancy were analyzed. Out of 340 articles, 11 studies were selected for qualitative synthesis, with seven being included in the quantitative analysis. Three studies showed a positive correlation between duloxetine blood concentrations and antidepressant effects. The adverse event irritability/anxiety was found to be concentration-dependent in one study. Across four studies (n = 223), the 25%-75% interquartile concentration range was 22-72 ng/mL. Two studies reported interquartile ranges of responders (72-116 ng/mL and 65-123 ng/mL), with one of them identifying a threshold concentration for clinical response (58 ng/mL). Neuroimaging studies indicated that 80% serotonin transporter occupancy is reached with blood concentrations above 10-15 ng/mL, while 50% norepinephrine transporter occupancy is observed at 58 ng/mL. We suggest a therapeutic reference range between 20 and 120 ng/mL to achieve optimal antidepressant effects during duloxetine treatment in adults. Due to duloxetine's inhibition of both serotonin and norepinephrine receptors, some patients benefit from low duloxetine concentrations, while others may need higher concentrations to benefit from norepinephrine transporter blockage. In case of non-response at low to medium concentrations (i.e. < 60 ng/mL), we recommend dose titration within the proposed reference range. Blood concentrations can be affected by smoking and certain medications. Hence, therapeutic drug monitoring of duloxetine is strongly recommended for dose titration, particularly with initial prescription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.