ReviewCureus2025
Iron Overload, Clonal Hematopoiesis, and Cancer Risk in Aging and Transfusion-Dependent Populations: A Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between chronic bronchitis and increased breast cancer risk in female patients.Public health action · 2026Article
- Nanotherapeutic Strategies for MASLD: From Pathological Mechanisms to Targeted Delivery Systems.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aging also contributes to cancer risk factor potentiation by disturbed iron metabolism and genomic instability, both of which contribute to enhanced risk of cancer, particularly in transfusion-dependent groups such as patients with β-thalassemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. Systemic iron overload results from chronic transfusions and progressively disturbed iron homeostasis and clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) that contribute to oncogenic burden. All these create a permissive profile in which carcinogenesis is favored by oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunctions, immune suppression, and disrupted DNA repair. This review synthesizes current literature regarding iron overload, clonal hematopoiesis, and aging to examine the combined impact on initiation of cancer (Appendices). It evaluates processes, such as Fenton chemistry, reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated DNA damage, pro-inflammatory signals, and hematopoietic clonal expansion, and therapeutic options, such as iron chelation, risk monitoring, and age-targeted therapies in risk-carrying elderly groups. Iron overload in aging and transfusional individuals is characterized by high ferritin, augmented non-transferrin-bound iron, and oxidative DNA damage, which all raise the risk of cancer, especially hepatocellular carcinoma. Concurrently, clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) increases with age and predisposes individuals to hematologic malignancies and cardiovascular disease. The interaction of these factors increases mutagenesis and inflammation. Iron chelation therapy (ICT) has been found to be effective in the reduction of iron burden and prevention of complications, but side effects and compliance are problematic. Some new evidence suggests that individualized ICT, combined with CHIP screening and non-invasive imaging (e.g., T2* MRI), can prevent malignancy in high-risk patients. Iron overload in aging and transfusion-dependent populations is a critical, modifiable risk factor for cancer. The accumulation of effects of clonal hematopoiesis underscores the need to incorporate monitoring and intervention strategies. Future research has to define molecular targets in iron and hematopoietic networks to employ individualized therapies that reduce the emergence of cancer and increase health span in aging, vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.