ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Case Report: Intra-aortic balloon pump in a patient with refractory cardiogenic shock complicating severe aortic stenosis-enhanced hemodynamic response with low aortic compliance.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation generates pressure changes that are primarily influenced by aortic compliance, an index of arterial elasticity that varies widely among patients with cardiovascular disease. However, the potential role of aortic compliance in determining IABP efficacy remains poorly understood. We present the case of an 80-year-old man with severe aortic stenosis and pneumonia who was admitted with generalized fatigue and worsening dyspnea. He developed refractory Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions stage D cardiogenic shock despite multiple vasopressors. In this patient, who had low aortic compliance (0.62-0.81 ml/mmHg), IABP initiation resulted in immediate hemodynamic improvement through enhanced diastolic augmentation and systolic unloading, leading to rapid reversal of both hypoperfusion and pulmonary congestion. Following successful weaning from vasopressors and IABP removal, the patient underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement without temporary mechanical circulatory support-related complications. The notable hemodynamic improvement observed in this case highlights the potential importance of aortic compliance as a key determinant of IABP efficacy in elderly patients with cardiogenic shock, suggesting that aortic compliance may help optimize patient selection for IABP support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.