Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40657160›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Optimizing protein yield from growing deer antlers.

Nicolás Alegría-Aravena, María-Pilar López-Garrido, Josefa Quiroz-Troncoso, Raquel González-Martos, Marta Sánchez-Díez, Clara Gavira-O'Neill, Andrés J García-Díaz, Tomás Landete-Castillejos, Carmen Ramírez-Castillejo, Louis Chonco and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicolás Alegría-Aravena *Instituto de Desarrollo Regional (IDR), Instituto de Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC) and Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniéros Agrónomos y Montes y Biotecnología (ETSIAMB), University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.
María-Pilar López-Garrido *Laboratorio de Genética Médica, Instituto de Biomedicina (IB), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.
Josefa Quiroz-TroncosoCentro de Tecnología Biomédica (CTB), Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas (ETSIAAB), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Raquel González-MartosCentro de Tecnología Biomédica (CTB), Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas (ETSIAAB), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Sánchez-DíezLaboratorio de Genética Médica, Instituto de Biomedicina (IB), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.
Clara Gavira-O'NeillCentro de Tecnología Biomédica (CTB), Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas (ETSIAAB), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Andrés J García-DíazInstituto de Desarrollo Regional (IDR), Instituto de Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC) and Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniéros Agrónomos y Montes y Biotecnología (ETSIAMB), University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.
Tomás Landete-Castillejos *Instituto de Desarrollo Regional (IDR), Instituto de Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC) and Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniéros Agrónomos y Montes y Biotecnología (ETSIAMB), University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.
Carmen Ramírez-Castillejo *Centro de Tecnología Biomédica (CTB), Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas (ETSIAAB), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Louis Chonco *Instituto de Desarrollo Regional (IDR), Instituto de Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC) and Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniéros Agrónomos y Montes y Biotecnología (ETSIAMB), University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.
Francisco Sánchez-Sánchez *Laboratorio de Genética Médica, Instituto de Biomedicina (IB), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Albacete, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing antlers in deer contain bioactive compounds, most of which are proteins and peptides with effects on health, such as anticancer and regenerative properties. However, efficient extraction of these biomolecules while preserving their integrity remains a challenge. This study aimed to optimize the extraction of proteins from growing antlers through liquid removal methods, solvent selection, ratios, temperature, and extraction time. Lyophilization was identified as the optimal method for preserving protein integrity, particularly in biologically active regions. Among the tested solvents, water emerged as the most effective for protein extraction, achieving optimal results at a 1:10 w/v ratio with 1 hour of magnetic stirring at room temperature, although remains to be tested the anticancer effect of solvents different to water. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) was quantified as a key indicator of extraction efficiency, demonstrating that the optimized protocol effectively preserves this kind of bioactive protein. This methodology provides a robust framework for the extraction of proteins from growing antlers, paving the way for future applications in biomedical research.

Indexed as

biomedical applicationsdeer velvet antlerIGF-1optimization methodprotein extraction

Identifiers

PMID40657160
PMCPMC12245863

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.