ReviewHealth science reports2025
Advanced Imaging Techniques (PET, fMRI, DTI) in Early Detection of Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review.
Review in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Brain atrophy in NMOSD and MOGAD: a meta-analysis of volumetric and DTI biomarkers.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Advanced diffusion MRI tract signatures in Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and the FTD/PPA spectrum.NeuroImage · 2026Review
- Divergence of cortical neurophysiology across different neurodegenerative disorders compared to healthy ageing.Progress in neurobiology · 2026Article
- Frontotemporal lobar degeneration complexity: atypical presentations and heterogeneous proteinopathies in five cases.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and vascular and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), are characterized by progressive cognitive and motor decline. So, timely detection, especially early in the disease process, is crucial. Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) are advanced neuroimaging techniques that have shown promise for early diagnosis. Objective: This review evaluates the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of PET, fMRI, and DTI in the early detection of neurodegenerative diseases. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library for studies published between 2014 and 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on phase 2 and 3 clinical trials involving adult patients with AD, PD, and FTD. Studies were assessed for diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and identification of early biomarkers using PET, fMRI, and DTI. Data were extracted and analyzed from 14 selected studies. Results: PET imaging with tracers like 18F-flortaucipir provided visualization of amyloid and tau aggregates in AD and dopaminergic changes in PD. PET showed a strong association with amyloid and tau pathology in AD, with up to 95% diagnostic performance. Another useful technique in identifying early changes in the brain networks was resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI), with a diagnostic accuracy of 80%-95%. DTI offered essential data on white matter connectivity and showed microstructural alterations that pointed to early neurodegenerative processes. Integrating these neuroimaging modalities with machine learning models further enhanced diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion: PET, fMRI, and DTI are valuable tools for the early diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. These techniques can identify structural and functional changes in the brain before the onset of clinical signs. Integrating these imaging techniques with machine learning improves diagnostic outcomes. Further large-scale studies with standardized methodologies are needed to validate these findings and implement these techniques in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.