ArticleAnnals of neurosciences2025
Exploring Psychological Impact of Legal Procedure and Victim Blaming on Women Domestic Violence Victims.
Article in Annals of neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Domestic violence includes pattern of abusive or coercive behaviours that occur over time and typically escalate in severity. These patterns of behaviour are directed to assert power, dominance, control and/or coercion over women in line with patriarchal notions of marriage. Prior literature had profoundly addressed the multi-factor implications of encounters with domestic violence, but the gap persists in the areas of societal victim-blaming and re-victimisation that occur during legal procedures. Purpose: This research aimed at exploring the psychological impact of societal victim blaming and re-victimisation through legal procedures among domestic violence victims. Methods: The current study adopted quantitative approach to address the research question. Ex-Post Facto research design was used. A representative sample of 100 women victims was selected through a purposive sampling technique. The dataset was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics to arrive at a meaningful conclusion. Result: Findings of the study reported that significant differences were observed in the victim-blaming attitudes, psychological distress and legal re-victimisation assessed across the age groups and type of abuse endured. Findings also suggested that victim-blaming attitudes legal re-victimisation significantly predicted psychological distress among participants with Conclusion: Findings of the study highlighted the catastrophic impact of victim-blaming attitudes and re-victimisation through legal procedures on various mental and psychological outcomes. Hence, this study presses on the importance of addressing the hurdles and psychological repercussions of legal procedures that victim had to encounter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.