ArticleFolia microbiologica2026
Whole genome sequencing analysis of Candida glabrata isolates collected from patients with selected drug-resistant candidiasis hospitalized in Eastern Poland.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut Hi-C metagenomes of severe COVID-19 patients: bacteria and yeast involved in gut-lung axis.mSphere · 2026Article
- Mechanism of azole resistance inJournal of medical microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The epidemiology data for candidiasis indicate an increase in Candida glabrata infections. Moreover, several reports have shown an increasing number of drug-resistant cases of these infections. The source of drug resistance can often be traced to genetic mutations in genes related to a drug's mechanism of action. Therefore, we conducted whole genome sequencing of several drug-resistant isolates of Candida glabrata collected from patients hospitalized in Eastern Poland to assess whether mutations in selected genes correlated with susceptibility analysis results. The fungal species from patient samples were identified, and the isolated Candida glabrata were subjected to antifungal drug susceptibility testing. The results were interpreted according to the EUCAST and CLSI recommendations. Susceptibility to 5-flucytosine was assessed using the ATB FUNGUS kit. Libraries were prepared according to the NEXTERA XT DNA Library Prep and subsequently sequenced. The outcomes indicated common resistance to two of the three analyzed echinocandins, as well as two cases of simultaneous resistance to echinocandins and selected azole-based drugs. We detected several previously reported mutations in selected resistance-related genes, as well as five that are first described here: ERG5 (M267I), ERG6 (R57K), PDH1 (K438Q, V434I, F600V, V1192S), FCY1 (M129T), and FCY2 (I384F). Neither of the identified nonsynonymous mutations was correlated with the drug resistance demonstrated in the susceptibility testing. Furthermore, we can exclude the possibility of acquired drug resistance, thereby raising questions about the possibility of unknown mechanisms of resistance to azole-based and echinocandin drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.