ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Perceptions and experiences of women referred during obstetric complications in Eastern Uganda: A qualitative study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Women, who are referred, tend to experience several challenges while accessing obstetric care. This study was conducted to explore the perceptions and experiences of women who were referred following emergency obstetric complications. We conducted 17 in-depth interviews with referrals. We explored women's responses to being referred, what they liked and disliked about being referred, and their challenges during referral. We identified five themes from the data: 1) the facilitators of the referral system, 2) barriers during obstetric referral, 3) the quality of care in the lower-level health facilities, 4) good quality of care in the referral facility, and 5) response to referral and appraisal of the referral system. An early decision to refer, communication between health facilities, and accompanying the woman to the higher-level referral site facilitated the referral process. Financial constraints, poor roads, long distances, multiple referrals, and the use of inappropriate modes of transport were the main barriers to referral. Women experienced disrespect, shortages of medicines and supplies, and unavailability of essential services in the lower-level facilities. The referral site was perceived to provide good quality care for referrals because of warm reception, immediate care, availability of services, and respectful and responsive healthcare providers. Women were fearful and reluctant to be referred because of distant referral sites, failure to recognize obstetric complications, and fear of cesarean section and mistreatment in the referral site. Some women were willing and complied to be referred because of their confidence of care in the referral site, and their ability to perceive obstetric complications. Women experienced challenges with referral systems from poor quality of care, and difficulty reaching the referral site. These experiences and perceptions shaped how women responded to and appraised the referral system. Strengthening the quality of care in lower-level health facilities is critical in improving the referral system.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.