Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40659651›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

A dimensional approach to psychosis: identifying cognition, depression, and thought disorder factors in a clinical sample.

Mikkel Schöttner Sieler, Philippe Golay, Sandra Vieira, Luis Alameda, Philippe Conus, Paul Klauser, Raoul Jenni, Jagruti Patel, Thomas A W Bolton, Patric Hagmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mikkel Schöttner SielerDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland. mikkel.schottner@unil.ch.
Philippe GolayGeneral Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2273-6241
Sandra VieiraDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-2934
Luis AlamedaGeneral Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8621-2885
Philippe ConusGeneral Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Paul KlauserCenter for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0284-4947
Raoul JenniCenter for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6479-5381
Jagruti PatelDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3249-7626
Thomas A W BoltonDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Patric HagmannDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) #197787Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 221638/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional classification systems based on broad nosological categories do not adequately capture the high heterogeneity of mental illness. One possible solution to this is to move to a multi-dimensional model of mental illness, as has been proposed by the Research Domain Criteria and Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology frameworks. In this study, we explored the dimensional structure of psychotic disorders. We focused on the question whether combining measures of psychosis with cognitive and depression-related measures results in meaningful, clinically relevant, and valid latent dimensions in a sample of early psychosis (n = 113) and chronic schizophrenia patients (n = 43, total n = 156). We used exploratory factor analysis to identify the symptom dimensions in the Lausanne Psychosis data, a multi-modal prospective data set that includes a broad behavioral assessment of patients diagnosed with psychotic disorders. We evaluated the validity of these dimensions by regressing them to several functioning measures. Our analysis revealed three dimensions: Cognition, Depression/Negative, and Thought Disorder, explaining 49.2% of the variance. They were related to measures of functioning, the R² ranging between 0.38 and 0.42. This study advances the development of a multi-dimensional characterization of psychotic disorders by identifying three symptom dimensions with predictive validity in people with psychosis.

Identifiers

PMID40659651
PMCPMC12259953

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.