ArticleScientific reports2025
Pulsed electric field ablation process-the effect of bifurcation stents on electric field and heat distribution.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel non-thermal technique for arrhythmia treatment, capable of targeting the epicardium. However, the effects of coronary bifurcation lesions (BL) and bifurcation stents (BS) on ablation efficacy have not been evaluated. A three-dimensional computer simulation model was developed to assess the effect of the ablation region. The ablation catheter was set to be located directly above the BS model by performing a true size reduction of the ablation device. The ablation region was evaluated using an electric field strength contour of 1000 V/cm. The influence of coronary BL and BS on PFA ablation efficacy was assessed using ablation effect maps from different models. BS did not induce electric field coupling, and the distortion of the electric field in the ablation region remained unchanged, with cold and hot spots located similarly. The presence of coronary branches reduced the ablation area width, with a maximum difference of 2.82 mm. The angle between the ablation catheter and the main coronary artery branch had a smaller effect on the ablation zone width, with a maximum difference of 1.24 mm. The presence of BS will have a positive effect on the temperature increase in the ablation region (3.59 °C temperature increase in the presence of BS). The results indicate that BL and BS influence the electric field distribution in the ablation region. However, this distortion is confined to the ablation area, with no coupling between the main coronary artery and its branches to exacerbate the electric field distortion. The presence of BS exacerbates the temperature rise at the ablation site, but this increase does not cause thermal damage to the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.