ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
ESE and Transfer Learning for Breast Tumor Classification.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we proposed a lightweight neural network architecture based on inverted residual network, efficient squeeze excitation (ESE) module, and double transfer learning, called TLese-ResNet, for breast cancer molecular subtype recognition. The inverted ResNet reduces the number of network parameters while enhancing the cross-layer gradient propagation and feature expression capabilities. The introduction of the ESE module reduces the network complexity while maintaining the channel relationship collection. The dataset of this study comes from the mammography images of patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in a hospital in Jiangxi. The dataset comprises preoperative mammography images with CC and MLO views. Given that the dataset is somewhat small, in addition to the commonly used data augmentation methods, double transfer learning is also used. Double transfer learning includes the first transfer, in which the source domain is ImageNet and the target domain is the COVID-19 chest X-ray image dataset, and the second transfer, in which the source domain is the target domain of the first transfer, and the target domain is the mammography dataset we collected. By using five-fold cross-validation, the mean accuracy and area under received surgery feature on mammographic images of CC and MLO views were 0.818 and 0.883, respectively, outperforming other state-of-the-art deep learning-based models such as ResNet-50 and DenseNet-121. Therefore, the proposed model can provide clinicians with an effective and non-invasive auxiliary tool for molecular subtype identification of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.