Evidence mapPaperPMID 40660295Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025

Feasibility of a co-designed and personalised intervention to improve vegetable intake in rural-dwelling young adults.

Katherine Mary Livingstone, Jonathan C Rawstorn, Stephanie R Partridge, Yuxin Zhang, Eric O, Stephanie L Godrich, Sarah A McNaughton, Gilly A Hendrie, Kathleen M Dullaghan, Gavin Abbott and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Advancing personalised and precision nutrition.Journal of nutritional science · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Katherine Mary LivingstoneInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia. k.livingstone@deakin.edu.au.
Jonathan C RawstornInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Stephanie R PartridgeSusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Sydney, Australia.
Yuxin ZhangInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Eric ODigital Services, DS Digital Engagement, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Stephanie L GodrichNutrition and Health Innovation Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Bunbury, WA, 6230, Australia.
Sarah A McNaughtonHealth and Well-Being Centre for Research Innovation, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia.
Gilly A HendrieHuman Health Program, Health & Biosecurity, CSIRO, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Kathleen M DullaghanInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Gavin AbbottInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Lauren C BlekkenhorstNutrition and Health Innovation Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, WA, 6027, Perth, Australia.
Ralph MaddisonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Scott BarnettApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute (A2I2), Deakin University, VIC, 3220, Geelong, Australia.
John C MathersHuman Nutrition & Exercise Research Centre, Centre for Healthier Lives, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Laura AlstonDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, VIC, 3280, Warrnambool, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1173803National Heart Foundation of Australia ID102498National Heart Foundation of Australia ID106646National Heart Foundation of Australia ID106800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study determined the feasibility, acceptability, engagement and efficacy of a co-designed and personalised digital intervention to increase vegetable intake (Veg4Me) in young (18-to-35 years) rural-dwelling Australian adults.

methodsParticipants living in rural Australia were recruited via local government networks and social media and randomised to receive 12-weeks’ access to personalised (intervention) or non-personalised (control) versions of the free Veg4Me web application. The intervention included: (1) personalised recipes, (2) geo-located food environment map, (3) healthy eating resources, (4) goal-setting portal, and (5) personalised e-newsletters. The primary outcome was feasibility (recruitment, participation, and retention rate). Secondary outcomes were user engagement, acceptability, and changes in dietary intake and habits. Descriptive statistics were presented for the intervention and control groups. Generalised linear models estimated group differences in outcomes at 12-weeks.

resultsOf the 125 eligible individuals who registered Veg4Me accounts, 116 were randomised and 83 completed postintervention data collection. Recruitment, participation and retention rates were 47%, 93% and 72%, respectively. Intervention participants had higher engagement (median 20 [IQR 3, 54] vs. 6 [IQR 1, 28] page visits/week) and acceptability of the intervention (76%; vs. 52%) than control. Almost all intervention participants liked having access to the recipe library (93%) and reported that the e-newsletters prompted them to access the intervention (90%). Most accessed the goal-setting function (78%), food environment map (76%), and healthy eating resources (63%). More intervention participants reported their vegetable intake had changed in the last 12 weeks, compared with the control (85% vs. 57%; p = 0.010). Mean vegetable intake at 12 weeks for intervention and control was 2.73 (SD 1.1) and 2.66 (SD 1.4) serves/day, respectively (p = 0.76). At 12 weeks, for the intervention and control, confidence to shop regularly for nutritious foods was 68% and 55% (p = 0.09), to cook root vegetables was 88% and 81% (p = 0.11), and to cook pulses was 54% and 48%, respectively (p = 0.52).

conclusionsA co-designed and personalised digital intervention to increase vegetable intake was feasible, engaging and acceptable among rural-dwelling young adults. Although change in reported vegetable intake was small, findings showed promise for improving dietary intake and habits. Larger trials of effectiveness are needed to determine whether personalised digital interventions can help address health inequities experienced by rural-dwelling young adults.

trial registrationAustralia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12623000179639, prospectively registered on 21/02/2023, according to the World Health Organizational Trial Registration Data Set. Universal Trial Number U1111-1284-9027.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyFeeding BehaviorHealth PromotionRural PopulationVegetablesAdolescentAdultAustraliaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultDietInterventionRuralVegetable intakeYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID40660295
PMCPMC12257653

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.