Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40660376›Full record

ArticleJournal of cannabis research2025

Patterns and factors among oncology fellows recommending medical cannabis to adults with cancer.

Kian Tehranchi, Rushad Patell, Poorva Bindal, Laura Dodge, Jason Freed, Mary Buss, Mara A Schonberg, Ilana Braun, Deepa Rangachari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cannabis research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kian Tehranchi *Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Rushad Patell *Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Poorva BindalDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Massachusetts Memorial Health, Worcester, MA, USA.
Laura DodgeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jason FreedDivision of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Mary BussPalliative Care Services, Department of Medicine, UConn Health, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Mara A SchonbergDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Ilana BraunDepartment of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Faber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Deepa RangachariDivision of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, 02215, Boston, MA, USA. drangach@bidmc.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical cannabis consumption is rising, but limited evidence informs the safety and efficacy of cannabis use in cancer patients. A national survey of oncology trainees found that most fellows felt insufficiently informed to make clinical recommendations about cannabis.

aimIn this secondary analysis, we aimed to measure how frequently trainees recommend in favor of cannabis and determine factors influencing this clinical practice.

methodsIn this cross-sectional survey study for fellows enrolled in oncology training programs across the United States, an online survey assessing trainee practices regarding medical cannabis was sent to 155 oncology fellowship program directors from January - March 2021; who were asked to distribute it to their fellows. The primary outcome was the frequency with which oncology fellows recommended cannabis in the prior year.

resultsNationally, 40 programs from 25 states participated, with 189 of 462 trainees across these programs responding (40.9% response rate). 22% (95% CI: 16.3-29.0%) of participants reported recommending medical cannabis to > 5 patients in the past year. 24% (95% CI: 18.4-30.5%) of participants had prior training in medical cannabis. Regarding participant characteristics, only prior training in medical cannabis was significantly associated with recommending cannabis to > 5 patients (RR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.4-4.2).

conclusionsWith increasing cannabis use among patients with cancer and given that a substantial number of oncology fellows recommend its use, it is crucial that fellowship training incorporate evidence-based curricula regarding medical cannabis use to guide informed decision-making between patients and their fellow providers.

Indexed as

CannabisEducationFellowsOncology

Identifiers

PMID40660376
PMCPMC12261571

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.